Meet the leaders in Harare—Edwin and Christine Shumba
Vida Li Sik • February 15, 2021

Edwin and Christine Shumba went into the full-time ministry in August 2015 and started leading the church in Harare in August 2018. Last year, God blessed the church with 18 baptisms and three restorations, and they now have 245 members. Currently, like the rest of the population, the brothers and sisters are affected by the country’s unstable economy and high rate of unemployment, limited Internet connectivity, erratic electricity supply and a shortage of water in some areas.
How were you met?
Edwin:
Barnabus Chukwueke invited me to church one Saturday morning during my last year of high school in 1989. I was queuing to make a phone call at a public booth. Barnabus had come to Zimbabwe on the mission team while he was still studying the Bible. I was doubtful about attending but did so, and was blown away by the interracial gathering I saw. I struggled with honesty and insecurity during the studies, but was baptised in 1990. The rest is history.
Christine:
A sister called Linda invited me to a Bible discussion in 1989. I was a working single at 19 years. The sisters lived in a household in my neighbourhood and built a friendship with me. Their warmth and love drew me to the church. Although I had grown up in a religious family, I didn’t know my Bible. I was quick to respond to the scriptures because I was amazed that no one had taught me these things before. The two aspects of my conversion which were the most difficult for me to change were to share my faith with strangers because I was very timid, and I had to forgive somebody in my past. It took me a while to change these aspects as I battled to think, feel and be like Jesus in these areas. Once I got over this hump, by God’s grace, I was happy to become a true follower of Christ and was baptised on 17 January 1990.
What is your favourite scripture?
Edwin: My favourite scriptures are in five chapters (38-42) of the book of Job.
Christine:
I
have many, but I’ll quote Jeremiah 17:7 (NIV) that says, “But blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him. He will be like a tree planted by the water that sends out its roots by the stream. It does not fear when heat comes; its leaves are always green. It has no worries in a year of drought and never fails to bear fruit.”
If you could invite anyone in the Bible over for dinner, who would you invite and why?
Edwin:
It would have to be Joshua, so I could learn about obedience and humility from him. I’d love to know how he humbly walked under the mentorship of Moses while almost obscure the entire time. I wonder how he kept himself humble despite experiencing the wonders he witnessed when Moses spent time with God. These encounters shaped his character, and it would be great to learn all that from him. Joshua was a man of great obedience and he followed through God’s instructions right up to the end. His discipline and great fear of God is something that I’d love to learn.
Christine:
I’d love to serve dinner to Simon Peter. I’ve always admired his resilience, and that he was so thick skinned. Jesus said in his presence, ‘Get behind me Satan.’ The Bible doesn’t even indicate he had an attitude with Jesus… what a pure heart. Plus, Jesus told him he’d betray him when the rooster crowed and Peter did exactly that. But then he was there at Pentecost ready to serve in the Kingdom. I’d ask him about another exciting event: walking on water. That must’ve been an amazing experience, until he started sinking and Jesus had to rescue him. I wonder how he felt, and what he thought in all these situations. Peter is like a rubber ball–always bouncing back. In my Christian journey sometimes I’ve not been spiritually okay, and experienced many challenges in working with people because we are all so different. I’d like to imitate Peter’s heart and keep bouncing back and move forward with a godly heart.
What’s the Harare church’s biggest strength?
Edwin:
Resilience.
What is your family motto?
Christine: “Togetherness”, broken down as doing things together as a family with our daughters Rumbidzai Kelly, Lisa and Laura.
More from Southern African Churches of Christ

In the messy arena of human relationships, whether in marriage, the workplace, church family, or the volatile world of online discourse, we constantly feel the pull of opposing forces. One voice urges us to defend truth fiercely; another calls us to extend grace generously. This is the divine tension of disagreement: holding both conviction and compassion without letting go of either. Today, we turn to a passage that cuts to the heart of how we handle differences: “My dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” – James 1:19-20 (NIV) James, writing to scattered believers across the nations, doesn’t offer fluffy advice. He gives a practical, counter-cultural blueprint for godly relationships: Be quick to listen. Slow to speak. Slow to anger. These aren’t suggestions for better conversations; they are directives for producing the righteousness God desires. This passage applies to husbands and wives, children and parents, bosses and workers; everyone from the pulpit to the pew. We all need to train ourselves to be better listeners. The divine tension in James’ command Here lies the tension: Listening requires humility and self-control, while speaking (especially in defense of truth) feels urgent. Anger can arise when we perceive injustice or error, yet James holds these in balance. We must lean into listening first, restrain our tongues, and guard our hearts against hasty wrath. Why? Because “human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” This isn’t a ban on all anger; Jesus displayed righteous anger in the temple (John 2:13-17). But human anger, tainted by our flesh, tends toward self-justification, escalation, and sin. It rarely births the fruit of the Spirit. The tension calls us to slow down enough for the Holy Spirit to lead, rather than our adrenaline. What science reveals about anger and “hearing” Modern neuroscience echoes what James knew by inspiration. When anger flares, our brain undergoes an “amygdala hijack.” The amygdala, the brain’s alarm system tied to fight-or-flight, floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol. This redirects resources: our heart rate spikes and oxygen flows to muscles for action, but our higher reasoning centers in the prefrontal cortex – responsible for judgment, empathy, and nuanced thinking – get suppressed. In this state, our ability to truly “hear” another person diminishes dramatically. Active listening, the tool that clarifies, disarms, and seeks understanding, becomes nearly impossible. We filter everything through threat detection, empathy drops, and we stop processing the other’s words for their actual meaning. Instead, while they are still speaking we start crafting rebuttals or counterattacks. This explains why conflicts escalate so quickly: we literally cannot hear well when flooded with anger. James’ call to be slow to anger is not just spiritual wisdom; it aligns with how God designed our brains to function best when governed by self-control rather than unchecked emotion. Recognizing our physiological limits isn’t about suppressing feelings, it’s about guarding our capacity for reason so we don’t accidentally sabotage the very justice we seek to defend. Even if the other person is operating out of a completely hijacked, high-emotion state, our calling to maintain self-control and clear thinking remains. When our prefrontal cortex goes offline, our hijacked brain defaults to intellectual shortcuts. This emotional flooding is precisely what predisposes us toward constructing caricatures, like the straw man, rather than engaging with the actual person.

On June 6, 1944, Allied forces stormed the beaches of Normandy. In the brutal hours that followed, the course of World War II shifted permanently. The enemy’s capacity to win had been broken. And yet, the fighting raged on for 11 more months. Soldiers still died; cities still burned. Berlin had not yet fallen. But every Allied commander knew the truth: what happened on D-Day determined what would happen on V-E Day (Victory in Europe Day). Victory was certain, even though it was not yet complete. Through his death and resurrection, Jesus Christ stormed the ultimate beach. The decisive battle against sin, death, and darkness has already been won. And yet, we are not yet living in the full experience of that victory. The war is over, and the war is still going. Not because the outcome is in doubt, but because we live between D-Day and V-E Day. This pattern – already won, not yet complete – is the “already but not yet,” and it is not a contradiction. It is the very fabric of the Christian life. As we’ve seen across this series, the fullness of God’s truth is rarely found in tidy, isolated categories. It is held in divine tension, where seemingly opposing realities coexist, each completing and guarding the other. And nowhere is that tension more vivid than in what Scripture says about our own salvation. The Biblical paradox The New Testament speaks of our adoption, redemption, salvation, sanctification, and resurrection in a way that constantly surprises us: as both accomplished facts and future hopes. This is not a theological error; it is the deliberate structure of a story that is already finished by the Author but still being written by the characters. Adoption Already: “You have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’” – Romans 8:15 Not yet: “We ourselves groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.” – Romans 8:23 Redemption Already: “In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.” – Ephesians 1:7 Not yet: “You were sealed for the day of redemption.” – Ephesians 4:30 Salvation Already: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith.” – Ephesians 2:8 Not yet: “How much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!” – Romans 5:9 Sanctification and resurrection Already: We are already sanctified in Christ and raised with him. – 1 Corinthians 1:2 and Ephesians 2:6 Not yet: We await final sanctification and the future resurrection of the dead at the last trumpet. – 1 Thessalonians 5:23–24 and 1 Corinthians 15:52 The same salvation is being described as past, present, and future. We have been saved. We are being saved. We will be saved. This is not a contradiction, it is the both/and of divine tension. Understanding the timeline To make sense of this, we need to understand how Scripture structures history. Jewish thought divided all of time into two ages: “This age” — the present age marked by sin, suffering, and death — and “the age to come,” when God would restore all things, defeat evil, and reign in fullness. The expectation was that these two ages would be strictly sequential: this age ends, the next one begins. What no one fully anticipated was that through the resurrection of Jesus and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, the “age to come” broke into “this age” before it was over. We now live in what theologians call “the age between the ages.” The Kingdom of God has arrived, and it is still arriving.




