Meet David and Barbra Gondongwe

Vida Li Sik • January 26, 2021

Spotlight on the leaders of the church in Bulawayo

This year, we’ll take time to get to know some of our leaders in the Southern African region of churches. First up are David and Barbra Gondongwe, who lead the church in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. David and Barbra entered the full-time ministry in 2008 and led the church in the capital, Harare, for 10 years. They moved back to Bulawayo in 2018. Life in the city is tough and characterised by high unemployment, made worse by the COVID-19 pandemic. Poverty is rife, and the population is battling to make ends meet. Most people survive by "hustling"—buying and selling whatever they can lay their hands on. Generally, it is common to see a woman sitting on the side of the street, and trying to sell a heap of very small, shriveled lemons. Some gather wild fruits from surrounding bushes, or collect Mopane worms which they try to sell to passers-by. Men beg to clean your vehicle for a small fee.  Despite all the economic hardship and death of loved ones, in 2020 the church in Bulawayo grew to 78 members–with 10 baptisms and one restoration. The church is very grateful for the benevolence funds they received from sister churches and praise God for his loving faithfulness towards them.

Where were you met?
David: In 1990, a colleague and I stopped by a supermarket in Avondale, Harare. I was pushing a large trolley that fell over and spilled its contents. For one long, embarrassing moment, the other shoppers gave us their complete attention. Then, as if by magic, a giant white man and his wife appeared (Kevin and Andee Finnerty who are now elders in NYCC) to help us. They invited us to church, but I bluntly told them, “I don’t do church.” They also gave me an invitation card to church, which I accepted because I didn’t want to seem ungrateful. At that time I was in the army but on attachment at the biochemistry department of the Public Health Laboratories as part of my Medical Laboratory Technology training. For a whole month, twice a week, we received phone calls from Kevin and Andee inviting us to midweek and Sunday service. Eventually I said to my colleague, “let us just go once then tell them we did not like it,” because they kept saying, ‘just come and see. You don’t have to come back if you don’t like it.’ 
One Sunday morning we went to church. I was still single then. I don’t remember the sermon title, but I vividly remember the point the preacher man made: that any sex outside of marriage is a sin. What convicted me was that I saw in his eyes that he believed it was possible for single people to abstain till marriage. That was a very noble idea. The challenge was that I was still single with no steady girlfriend, meaning if I committed myself I would need to stay pure for many years. I'm always one for taking up a good challenge, so I studied the Bible and a month later, on 30 November 1990 I was baptised.

Barbra: I was met on campus, at The University of Zimbabwe, in 1990. I was at the lowest point of my life. The previous college break, I had just survived what I now understand was severe depression. I had just collapsed, while I was at my parents’ home, and knew that I was dying, even though I didn’t know why. I had just come out of a seriously confusing time. In my first year on campus, I’d been involved in a lot of sin; it killed something inside of me and I was just a shell of the happy, bubbly me. 
A college mate invited me to a games afternoon. I told her I wasn’t interested. I was quite antisocial at that time and really didn’t like people. I was a loner. That afternoon, I went for my usual lonely walks. By default, my road passed by the house where the games were taking place. I could hear lots of laughter, and so I just peered in through the gate. Of course disciples quickly invited me in and totally embraced me. Somehow, I loosened up, and ended up being the happiest, loudest girl at that party. At the end of the day, they asked me if I would like to study the Bible. I agreed, but I was religiously proud and believed I knew the Bible more than most people. But by the time we had looked at the first few scriptures of the word study, I was totally humbled. I loved the studies and studied almost every day. I spoke about the mess of my life, cried my heart out and felt the burden of sin fall off. I was restored to my old happy self. Within that same month, I was baptised. I have never looked back. I continue to be humbled by God’s love and goodness to me.

What is your favourite Bible verse?
David: My favourite verse is Ephesians 4:2 “Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love.
Barbra: For me, it’s Jeremiah 29.11 “For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the LORD, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.” It kept me sane, those many years ago, when I broke up with my American boyfriend. He was an exchange programme student from Michigan, who after the mess of my first year, had just accepted me as I was and loved me. He went back to the States and bought a ticket for me to follow. But, about two or three weeks before my flight, I started studying the Bible. At the end of my studies, I had to make a decision to pursue my relationship with my boyfriend, or to seriously pursue and hold on to my relationship with God. I chose the latter, and have never looked back. Now, 28 years later, married to a hunky, handsome guy who loves God more than he loves me, my cup overflows.

If you could witness any great event in the Bible, which one would it be, and why?
David: For me, it would be the crossing of the Red Sea, and the total annihilation of the mighty Egyptian army. I love and feel inspired by a good fight, especially one in which the underdog triumphs. Inspired as I already am, to see it live would boost my faith for eternity.
Barbra: The angel Gabriel’s visit to Mary to tell her she would conceive and be the mother to a son, Emmanuel. The simplicity of her faith, and her acceptance of God’s wish, amazes me. I think that conversation is just so beautiful.

Which person in the Bible would you like to have in your church, and why?
David: I’d be thrilled to have Barnabas, the son of encouragement. The church would benefit a lot from his character traits, and I’d learn from him in relating better with others.
Barbra: That would be Abigail. She would inspire so many of us (the sisters). Her wisdom, as a godly woman, married to an ungodly man, her managing her household; her experience as a widow, and her wisdom as one of the wives of King David. There is so much wealth there.

Describe your own family in a few words.
David: Adventurous, Fun-loving.
Barbra: A gift; fun, deep/strong.

The Gondongwe family

More from Southern African Churches of Christ

By Justin Renton August 4, 2026
In the messy arena of human relationships, whether in marriage, the workplace, church family, or the volatile world of online discourse, we constantly feel the pull of opposing forces. One voice urges us to defend truth fiercely; another calls us to extend grace generously. This is the divine tension of disagreement: holding both conviction and compassion without letting go of either. Today, we turn to a passage that cuts to the heart of how we handle differences: “My dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” – James 1:19-20 (NIV) James, writing to scattered believers across the nations, doesn’t offer fluffy advice. He gives a practical, counter-cultural blueprint for godly relationships: Be quick to listen. Slow to speak. Slow to anger. These aren’t suggestions for better conversations; they are directives for producing the righteousness God desires. This passage applies to husbands and wives, children and parents, bosses and workers; everyone from the pulpit to the pew. We all need to train ourselves to be better listeners. The divine tension in James’ command Here lies the tension: Listening requires humility and self-control, while speaking (especially in defense of truth) feels urgent. Anger can arise when we perceive injustice or error, yet James holds these in balance. We must lean into listening first, restrain our tongues, and guard our hearts against hasty wrath. Why? Because “human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.” This isn’t a ban on all anger; Jesus displayed righteous anger in the temple (John 2:13-17). But human anger, tainted by our flesh, tends toward self-justification, escalation, and sin. It rarely births the fruit of the Spirit. The tension calls us to slow down enough for the Holy Spirit to lead, rather than our adrenaline. What science reveals about anger and “hearing” Modern neuroscience echoes what James knew by inspiration. When anger flares, our brain undergoes an “amygdala hijack.” The amygdala, the brain’s alarm system tied to fight-or-flight, floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol. This redirects resources: our heart rate spikes and oxygen flows to muscles for action, but our higher reasoning centers in the prefrontal cortex – responsible for judgment, empathy, and nuanced thinking – get suppressed. In this state, our ability to truly “hear” another person diminishes dramatically. Active listening, the tool that clarifies, disarms, and seeks understanding, becomes nearly impossible. We filter everything through threat detection, empathy drops, and we stop processing the other’s words for their actual meaning. Instead, while they are still speaking we start crafting rebuttals or counterattacks. This explains why conflicts escalate so quickly: we literally cannot hear well when flooded with anger. James’ call to be slow to anger is not just spiritual wisdom; it aligns with how God designed our brains to function best when governed by self-control rather than unchecked emotion. Recognizing our physiological limits isn’t about suppressing feelings, it’s about guarding our capacity for reason so we don’t accidentally sabotage the very justice we seek to defend. Even if the other person is operating out of a completely hijacked, high-emotion state, our calling to maintain self-control and clear thinking remains. When our prefrontal cortex goes offline, our hijacked brain defaults to intellectual shortcuts. This emotional flooding is precisely what predisposes us toward constructing caricatures, like the straw man, rather than engaging with the actual person.
By Justin Renton July 9, 2026
On June 6, 1944, Allied forces stormed the beaches of Normandy. In the brutal hours that followed, the course of World War II shifted permanently. The enemy’s capacity to win had been broken. And yet, the fighting raged on for 11 more months. Soldiers still died; cities still burned. Berlin had not yet fallen. But every Allied commander knew the truth: what happened on D-Day determined what would happen on V-E Day (Victory in Europe Day). Victory was certain, even though it was not yet complete. Through his death and resurrection, Jesus Christ stormed the ultimate beach. The decisive battle against sin, death, and darkness has already been won. And yet, we are not yet living in the full experience of that victory. The war is over, and the war is still going. Not because the outcome is in doubt, but because we live between D-Day and V-E Day. This pattern – already won, not yet complete – is the “already but not yet,” and it is not a contradiction. It is the very fabric of the Christian life. As we’ve seen across this series, the fullness of God’s truth is rarely found in tidy, isolated categories. It is held in divine tension, where seemingly opposing realities coexist, each completing and guarding the other. And nowhere is that tension more vivid than in what Scripture says about our own salvation. The Biblical paradox The New Testament speaks of our adoption, redemption, salvation, sanctification, and resurrection in a way that constantly surprises us: as both accomplished facts and future hopes. This is not a theological error; it is the deliberate structure of a story that is already finished by the Author but still being written by the characters. Adoption Already: “You have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, ‘Abba! Father!’” – Romans 8:15 Not yet: “We ourselves groan inwardly as we wait eagerly for adoption as sons, the redemption of our bodies.” – Romans 8:23 Redemption Already: “In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.” – Ephesians 1:7 Not yet: “You were sealed for the day of redemption.” – Ephesians 4:30 Salvation Already: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith.” – Ephesians 2:8 Not yet: “How much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!” – Romans 5:9 Sanctification and resurrection Already: We are already sanctified in Christ and raised with him. – 1 Corinthians 1:2 and Ephesians 2:6 Not yet: We await final sanctification and the future resurrection of the dead at the last trumpet. – 1 Thessalonians 5:23–24 and 1 Corinthians 15:52 The same salvation is being described as past, present, and future. We have been saved. We are being saved. We will be saved. This is not a contradiction, it is the both/and of divine tension. Understanding the timeline To make sense of this, we need to understand how Scripture structures history. Jewish thought divided all of time into two ages: “This age” — the present age marked by sin, suffering, and death — and “the age to come,” when God would restore all things, defeat evil, and reign in fullness. The expectation was that these two ages would be strictly sequential: this age ends, the next one begins. What no one fully anticipated was that through the resurrection of Jesus and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, the “age to come” broke into “this age” before it was over. We now live in what theologians call “the age between the ages.” The Kingdom of God has arrived, and it is still arriving.
By Justin Renton June 1, 2026
In every major conflict, whether political, personal, or spiritual, there is almost always a sliver of validity on both sides. Grievances are real. Injustices are felt. Leaders on the “wrong” side can even articulate legitimate frustrations.
Show More